Two Decades of Bhutan Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

  • Lingchen Lingchen Sherubtse College Royal University of Bhutan Kanglung, Trashigang Bhutan
  • Yeshey Dorji Samtse College of Education Royal University of Bhutan Samtse, Bhutan

Keywords:

Bibliometric Analysis, Citation Analysis, JBS, Immediacy Index, Impact Factor, H-index,

Abstract

The paper gives bibliometric dimensions and characteristics of Bhutan Studies during last two decades based on papers published in the Journal of Bhutan Studies (JBS). Methodologies, used are descriptive statistics for quantifiable bibliometric characteristics and impact analysis using both Garfield's formula and Harzing's Publish or Perish (PoP) software citation analysis program. Longitudinal trends were examined with respect to the number of articles published, the number of citations received, the immediacy index, and the journal's impact factor. The most prolific authors and highly cited articles related to the area were also established, including geographic distribution and specific subjects covered under the area.

Author Biographies

  • Lingchen Lingchen, Sherubtse College Royal University of Bhutan Kanglung, Trashigang Bhutan

    Deputy Chief Librarian

    Sherubtse College Library

    Sherubtse College

    Royal University of Bhutan

  • Yeshey Dorji, Samtse College of Education Royal University of Bhutan Samtse, Bhutan

    Library Specialist

    Samtse College Library

    Samtse College of Education

    Samtse, Bhutan

References

Andrés, A. (2009). Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Elsevier.

Baneyx, A. (2008). “Publish or Perish” as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history. Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 56(6), 363-371.

Bayer, A. (1982). A Bibliometric Analysis of Marriage and Family Literature. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44(3), 527-538. doi:10.2307/351577.

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2009). The state of h index research. EMBO reports, 10(1), 2-6.

Davarpanah, M., & Aslekia, S. (2008). A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77(1), 21-39.

Dinkel, W. (2011). Sept 12-16 Vienna h index and related measures – part 1: The h index: definitions, calculations, limitations and benefits. European summer school for scientometrics. Retrieved from https://www.scientometrics-school.eu/images/h-index_Part1_Dinkel.pdf.

Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama, 295(1), 90-93.

Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193.

Gracza, T., & Somoskovi, I. (2007). Impact factor and/or Hirsch index? Orvosi Hetilap, 148(18), 849-852.

Harzing, A. W. K., & Van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in science and environmental politics, 8(1), 61-73.

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572.

Kotzé, T. (2007). Guidelines on writing a first quantitative academic article. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

Lee, J. D., Cassano-Pinché, A., & Vicente, K. J. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of human factors (1970-2000): a quantitative description of scientific impact. Human factors, 47(4), 753-766.

Linde, A. (1998). On the pitfalls of journal ranking by Impact Factor. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 106(1), 525.

López-Cózar, E. D., Orduña-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., & Ayllón, J. M. (2018). Google Scholar: the 'big data’ bibliographic tool. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1806.06351.

McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns: a citation study from Thomson Scientific (p. 125). Philadelphia, PA: Thomson Scientific.

Ogden, T. L., & Bartley, D. L. (2008). The ups and downs of journal impact factors. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 52(2), 73-82.

Petsko, G. A. (2008). Having an impact (factor). Genome biology, 9(7), 107.

Price, D.S., John, D. (1965). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Bmj, 314(7079), 497.

Silobrcic, V. (2015). How to increase the impact factor of a scientific journal? Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gyenecology; 9(4), 357-360

Simons, K. (2008). The misused impact factor. Science, 322(5899), 165-165.

Smith, D. (2009). A 30-Year Citation Analysis of Bibliometric Trends at the Archives of Environmental Health, 1975–2004. Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health, 64: sup1, 43-54. doi.org/10.1080/19338240903293004.

Ura, K., Alkire, S., Zangmo, T., & Wangdi, K. (2012). A short guide to gross national happiness index. The Centre for Bhutan Studies.

Woeginger, G. J. (2008). An axiomatic analysis of Egghe’s g-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 364-368.

Wolfram, D. (2003). Applied informetrics for information retrieval research (No. 36) Greenwood Publishing Group.

Published

2020-11-27