Digital Advocacy and Invisible Archives: Discoverability in Biodiversity Knowledge Systems - The Case of David Attenborough
Abstract
Digitisation is often framed as a technical solution for preservation and access; however, this paper argues that it should be understood as a form of advocacy that actively shapes visibility, interpretation, and authority in archival contexts. Drawing on scholarship in digital history, community archives, and activist archiving, it introduces the concept of “invisible archives” and adopts a conceptual, example-driven approach, examining cases such as the Digital Archives and Marginalized Communities project to analyse selection, metadata, and interface design. The paper finds that digitisation practices—what is selected, how it is described, and how it is presented—can reinforce or challenge existing hierarchies, with metadata, multilingual description, and interface design playing a crucial role in discoverability and representation, and access models shaping engagement. As a primarily conceptual study, it highlights the need for further empirical and user-focused research. It proposes an advocacy-oriented framework grounded in intentional selection, community-informed metadata, and context-sensitive design, and underscores how such approaches can support more inclusive and equitable knowledge systems while addressing ethical concerns around access and consent. By reframing digitisation as an active site of advocacy and introducing “invisible archives” as a critical lens, the paper contributes a new perspective to discussions on digital archives.
Keywords
References
Allard, D., & Ferris, S. (2016). The Digital Archives and Marginalized Communities Project: Building anti‑violence archives. University of Manitoba / IDEALS. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/4727
Digital Archives and Marginalized Communities Project. (2016). The digital archives and marginalized communities project: Building anti-violence archives. https://www.academia.edu/67568237/The_Digital_Archives_and_Marginalized_Communities_Project_Building_Anti_violence_Archives
Giraud, E. H., & Wright, K. (2024). Digital archives as resisting displacement. Cultural Politics, 20(2), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-10958065
Giraud, E. H., & Wright, K. (2024). Reassembling digital archives: Strategies for counter-archiving (working paper version). https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/206945/
Hyphen. (2024, August 15). “It is the politics of visibility”: The community archives saving their stories. https://hyphenonline.com/2024/08/16/it-is-the-politics-of-visibility-the-community-archives-history-collection-wal-tate-modern-goldsmiths/
International Network for Cultural Diversity. (2024). Archiving activism in the digital age (INC Reader No. 52). https://networkcultures.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ArchivingActivismintheDigitalAge_INC24_TOD52.pdf
Royal Historical Society. (2023, January 16). Historical research in the digital age, part 3: Why archivists digitise, and why it matters. https://blog.royalhistsoc.org/2023/01/17/historical-research-in-the-digital-age-part-3-why-archivists-digitise-and-why-it-matters/
Zaagsma, G. (2023). Digital history and the politics of digitization. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(2), 830–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac080
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Informatics Studies | ISSN: 2583-8954 (Online), 2320-530X (Print)