Marine Bio-informatics Tools: A Metagenomic Approach
Abstract
Bioinformatics has pervaded all fields of biology and has become a necessity for biological research now. Along with incorporation of bioinformatics in conventional life science curricula, hands-on experience on usage of different bioinformatic tools to address practical research problems are crucial to incite students. Identification of novel bioactive compounds from marine source is an active area of research in marine biotechnology. This paper discusses in detail a practical approach for identification of novel enzymes from marine microorganisms. Metagenomics, which enables culture independent genome analysis of microorganisms is introduced in the article. The sequence of the probe for screening the metagenomic cosmid library is developed, using databases such as BRENDA and programs such as BLAST and Clustal Omega, starting with the chemical structure of the substrate for the prospective enzyme. Problem solving approach as discussed in the article is more preferable and beneficial for teaching bioinformatics than traditional lectures.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alma'abadi AD, Gojobori T, Mineta K (2015). Marine Metagenome as a resource for novel enzymes. Genomics, Proteomics Bioinformatics. 13(5):290-5.
Blatter M-C, Baillie Gerritsen V, Palagi PM, Bougueleret L. Xenarios I (2016). The Metagenomic Pizza: a simple recipe to introduce bioinformatics to the layman. EMBnet.journal. 22:e864.
BRENDA (2019). [https://www.brenda-enzymesorg] .Accessed 03 Sept 2019.
Campbell AM (2003). Public access for teaching genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics. Cell Biol Educ. 2(2):98-111.
Cimmaruta C, Liguori L, Monticelli M, Andreotti G. Citro V (2017). E-Learning for Rare Diseases: An Example Using Fabry Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2049.
Edwards RA, Haggerty JM, Cassman N, Busch JC, Aguinaldo K, Chinta S, Vaughn MH, Morey R, Harkins TT, Teiling C, et al (2013). Microbes, metagenomes and marine mammals: enabling the next generation of scientist to enter the genomic era. BMC Genomics. 14(1):600.
Gibbens BB, Scott CL, Hoff CD, Schottel JL. Exploring metagenomics in the laboratory of an introductory biology course. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 16(1):34-40.
Gibson DT, Parales RE (2000). Aromatic hydrocarbon dioxygenases in environmental biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol.11(3):236-43.
Hingamp P, Brochier C, Talla E, Gautheret D, Thieffry D, Herrmann C (2008). Metagenome annotation using a distributed grid of undergraduate students. PLoS Biol. 6(11):e296.
Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL (2008). NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 (Web Server issue):W5-9.
Kennedy J, Flemer B, Jackson SA, Lejon DP, Morrissey JP, O'Gara F, Dobson AD (2010). Marine metagenomics: new tools for the study and exploitation of marine microbial metabolism. Mar Drugs. 8(3):608-28.
King MD, Phillips P, Turner MW, Katz M, Lew S, Bradburn S, Andersen T, McDougal OM (2016). Computational exploration of a protein receptor binding space with student proposed peptide ligands. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 44(1):63-7.
Korcsmaros T, Dunai ZA, Vellai T, Csermely P (2013). Teaching the bioinformatics of signaling networks: an integrated approach to facilitate multi-disciplinary learning. Brief Bioinform. 14(5):618-32.
Kossida S, Tahri N, Daizadeh I (2002). Bioinformatics by example: from sequence to target. J Chem Educ. 79(12):1480.
Laursen L (2011). Spain's ship comes in. Nature. 475(7354):16-7.
Letchford J, Corradi H, Day T (2017). A flexible e-learning resource promoting the critical reading of scientific papers for science undergraduates. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 45(6):483-90.
Madhavan A, Sindhu R, Parameswaran B, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A (2017). Metagenome analysis: a powerful tool for enzyme bioprospecting. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 183(2):636-51.
Mullan LJ, Bleasby AJ (2002). Short EMBOSS user guide. European molecular biology open software suite. Brief Bioinform. 3(1):92-4.
Olson SA (2002). EMBOSS opens up sequence analysis. European molecular biology open software suite. Brief Bioinform.3(1):87-91.
Parales JV, Kumar A, Parales RE, Gibson DT (1996). Cloning and sequencing of the genes encoding 2-nitrotoluene dioxygenase from Pseudomonas sp. JS42. Gene. 181(1-2):57-61.
Pevzner P, Shamir R (2009). Computing has changed biology-biology education must catch up. Science. 325(5940):541-2.
Plotka-Wasylka J, Kurowska-Susdorf A, Sajid M, de la Guardia M, Namiesnik J, Tobiszewski M (2018). Green chemistry in higher education: state of the art, challenges, and future trends. ChemSusChem. 11(17):2845-58.
Popovic A, Tchigvintsev A, Tran H, Chernikova TN, Golyshina OV, Yakimov MM, Golyshin PN, Yakunin AF (2015): Metagenomics as a Tool for Enzyme Discovery: Hydrolytic Enzymes from Marine-Related Metagenomes. In: Prokaryotic Systems Biology. Edited by Krogan PNJ, Babu PM. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 1-Metagenomics as a Tool for Enzyme Discovery: Hydrolytic Enzymes from Marine-Related Metagenom20.
Qu Y, Shen E, Ma Q, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Shen W, Wang J, Li D, Li H, Zhou J (2015). Biodegradation of indole by a newly isolated Cupriavidus sp. SHE. J Environ Sci (China).34:126-32.
Quatrini R, Valdès J, Jedlicki E, Holmes DS (2007). The use of bioinformatics and genome biology to advance our understanding of bioleaching microorganisms. In: Donati E.R., Sand W. (eds). Microbial Processing of Metal Sulfides. Springer, Dordrecht. 221-39.
Rath CM, Janto B, Earl J, Ahmed A, Hu FZ, Hiller L, Dahlgren M, Kreft R, Yu F, Wolff JJ, et al (2011). Meta-omic characterization of the marine invertebrate microbial consortium that produces the chemotherapeutic natural product ET-743. ACS Chem Biol. 6(11):1244-56.
Ray S, Koshy NR, Reddy PJ, Srivastava S (2012). Virtual labs in proteomics: new E-learning tools. J Proteome. 75(9):2515-25.
Resnick S, Lee K, Gibson D (1996). Diverse reactions catalyzed by naphthalene dioxygenase from Pseudomonas sp strain NCIB 9816. J Ind Microbiol. 17(5-6):438-57.
Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000). EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. 16(6):276-7.
Rusch DB, Halpern AL, Sutton G, Heidelberg KB, Williamson S, Yooseph S, Wu D, Eisen JA, Hoffman JM, Remington K, et al (2007). The sorcerer II Global Ocean sampling expedition: Northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol. 5(3):e77.
Schomburg I, Jeske L, Ulbrich M, Placzek S, Chang A, Schomburg D (2017). The BRENDA enzyme information system-from a database to an expert system. J Biotechnol. 261:194-206.
Sievers F, Higgins DG (2018). Clustal omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences. Protein Sci. 27(1):135-45.
Stothard P (2000). The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques. 28(6):1102 1104.
Subramani R, Aalbersberg W (2012). Marine actinomycetes: an ongoing source of novel bioactive metabolites. Microbiol Res. 167(10):571-80.
Sunagawa S, Karsenti E, Bowler C, Bork P (2015). Computational eco-systems biology in Tara oceans: translating data into knowledge. Mol Syst Biol. 11(5):809.
Ufarté L, Laville É, Duquesne S, Potocki-Veronese G (2015). Metagenomics for the discovery of pollutant degrading enzymes. Biotechnol Adv. 33(8):1845-54.
UniProt Consortium 92019). UniProt: a worldwide hub for protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D506-15.
Welsch ME, Snyder SA, Stockwell BR (2010). Privileged scaffolds for library design and drug discovery. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 14(3):347-61.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Informatics Studies: ISSN: 2583-8994 (Online), 2320-530X (Print)