Adaptive Continuity of Buddhist Dhamma in India and Sri Lanka: An Archaeological, Historical and Semiotic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65408/cird602201Keywords:
Buddhism, Dhamma, Adaptive Continuity, Religion, Heritage, Semiotic Interpretation, Archaeology, History, Evidence, Cultural AdaptationAbstract
This study examines the historical continuity and adaptation of Buddhist dhamma in India and Sri Lanka through archaeological, historical, and semiotic perspectives. It investigates how Buddhist traditions responded to changing political, economic, social, and cultural contexts while maintaining connections with their foundational teachings. Drawing on historical narratives, archaeological remains, inscriptions, religious architecture, and Buddhist imagery, the study explores the roles of royal patronage, monastic institutions, textual transmission, and regional cultural interactions in sustaining Buddhist traditions. Semiotic analysis examines how symbols, including stupas, the Bodhi tree, the dharma wheel, and Buddha images, acquired new meanings across historical periods and cultural settings. A comparative reading of India and Sri Lanka highlights both continuities and regionally specific transformations. The study proposes an adaptive process linking symbols, contextual reinterpretation, institutional embedding, material expression, and renewed symbolism. It also considers the potential of Heritage Informatics to document and interpret these transformations through digital records, spatial data, and three-dimensional representations. The study argues that Buddhist continuity is best understood as an ongoing negotiation between inherited traditions and changing historical circumstances.
References
Ashitsu, Z. (1894). The fundamental teachings of Buddhism. The Monist, 4(2), 163–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27897133
Bechert, H. (1970). Theravāda Buddhist Sangha: Some General Observations on Historical and Political Factors in its Development. The Journal of Asian Studies, 29(4), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943086
Carus, P. (1897). The philosophy of Buddhism. The Monist, 7(2), 255–286. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27897409
Carter, J. R. (1977). A history of “early Buddhism.” Religious Studies, 13(3), 263–287. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20005420
Chandra, M. (1977). Trade and Trade Routes in Ancient India. Abhinav Publication.
Coningham, R., & Young, R. (2015). Introduction and definitions. In The archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka, c. 6500 BCE–200 CE (pp. 3–31). Cambridge University Press.
Davids, T. W. R. (1900). Buddhism. The North American Review, 171(527), 517–527. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25105066
De Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.; W. Baskin, Trans.). McGraw-Hill Book Company.
de Silva, M. U. (2010). Resurgence of Buddhism during the Colonial Period. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Sri Lanka, 56, 1–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23731262
Edmunds, A. J., & Suzuki, T. (1904). The first Buddhist council. The Monist, 14(2), 253–282. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27899468
Frauwallner, E. (1956). The earliest Vinaya and the beginnings of Buddhist literature. Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
Geiger, W. (Ed.). (1912). The Mahāvaṃsa or the Great Chronicle of Ceylon (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
Gombrich, R. F. (2006). How Buddhism began: The conditioned genesis of the early teachings (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hirakawa, A. (1990). A history of Indian Buddhism: From Śākyamuni to early Mahāyāna (P. Groner, Trans. & Ed.). University of Hawaii Press.
Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. (2003). Reading the past: Current approaches to interpretation in archaeology (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, S. (2020). Footprints in the Early Buddhist Art of India. Julia A. B. Hegewald(Eds.), Studies in Asian art and culture(pp. 425-517), Berlin: EB-Verlag Dr. Brandt
Jayaswal, K. P. (1943). Hindu polity: A constitutional history of India in Hindu times. Bangalore Printing & Publishing Co.
Long, W. J. (2021). A Buddhist approach to international relations. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68042-8
Nanamoli, B., & Bodhi, B. (Trans.). (1995). The middle length discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Majjhima Nikāya. Wisdom Publications.
Peirce, C. S. (1992). On a new list of categories. In N. Houser & C. J. W. Kloesel (Eds.), The Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Volume 1 (1867–1893) (pp. 1–10). Indiana University Press.
Prebish, C. S. (1974). A review of scholarship on the Buddhist councils. The Journal of Asian Studies, 33(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2052186
Raghuramaraju, A. (2013). Buddhism in Indian philosophy. India International Centre Quarterly, 40(3/4), 65–85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24394390
Rathanasara, K. (2021). බැමිණිතියා මහා සාගතය (Baminitiya Maha Sagataya). Colombo: S. Godage and Brothers. ISBN 978-624-00-1023-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18144636
Rhys Davids, T. W. (Trans.). (1899–1921). Dialogues of the Buddha (3 vols.). Oxford University Press.
Sri Lanka. (1978). The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. www.parliament.lk
Tagore, G. M. (1863). On Buddhism. Transactions of the Ethnological Society of London, 2, 182–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/3014316
Thapar, R. (1963). Ashoka and the decline of the Mauryas. Oxford University Press.
Willemen, C., Dessein, B., & Cox, C. (2022). Sarvāstivāda Buddhist scholasticism. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004493209
Woodward, F. L., & Hare, E. M. (Trans.). (1932–1936). The book of the gradual sayings (Aṅguttara-Nikāya) or more-numbered suttas (Vols. 1–5). Pali Text Society.
Williams, R. B. (1970). Historical criticism of a Buddhist scripture: “The Mahāparinibbāna Sutta.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 38(2), 156–167. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1461172
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kasun S. Jayasuriya, Vinay Kumar, Kaudagammana Rathanasara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of a manuscript to IS indicates that the work is original, has not been previously published (except as an abstract, lecture, or thesis), and is not under consideration by another journal. By submitting, authors affirm that their manuscript meets the journal’s ethical and editorial standards and that they agree to the terms of copyright and licensing upon acceptance.
Once accepted for publication, authors grant IS the first publication rights to the work. However, authors retain full copyright of their content and remain the legal owners of their intellectual property.
IS provides open access to all published articles six months after the release of the respective volume. Once the embargo period concludes, articles are made freely available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This license allows users to share, adapt, and reuse the work in any medium or format provided that appropriate credit is given to the original authors and the initial publication in this journal.
The journal's delayed open access model supports global knowledge dissemination, ensuring that research is accessible without financial or legal barriers. Authors are also encouraged to archive their published articles in institutional repositories, personal websites, or other platforms, with full citation of the journal version. Pre-print versions posted online should include a citation and link to the final published version in IS as soon as the issue is available; post-print versions (including the final publisher's PDF) should include a citation and link to the journal's website.
All materials published in the IS website are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution license, unless otherwise noted.